Religion, Expression, and the Courts

Posted on: June 12th, 2011 by Thorn 5 Comments

One day, the Muslim chaplain said there was a chaplaincy position opening up and that I should apply for it. By this time, I had the second largest congregation at the prison, and it was clear that the inmates really needed clergy support. It was also made expressly clear, that no current state chaplain would be willing to serve the Pagan community or help facilitate their needs. So I went to the personnel office to fill out a state application for the position, but the personnel manager refused to give me one. She told me that I could not fill out a job application — because of my religion, Wicca. I explained to her that without my filling out an application, the CDCR couldn’t possibly determine whether or not I met the qualifications for the job, and that no one there knew what qualifications I actually had.

- Patrick McCollum

Though I have written on this quite recently, I want to reiterate my support, and the support of Solar Cross, for Patrick McCollum. In speaking with him, and with one of his legal advisors, we are holding off on any ideas for fundraising. Solar Cross is currently setting up an oversight committee for a Pagan Prison Chaplains Fund in order to collect funds from our communities to support the volunteer chaplains who may need travel or other expenses reimbursed. Our goal is to have everything in place by August and hope that people are willing to donate some money to those who donate so much time and effort.

Also, to clear up some confusion people had about why prisoners were not being asked to file their own grievances by volunteer chaplains: they have been, and have done so. Rev. McCollum addresses this in his statement, which you can find in the link at the end of this post. Both Patrick and Robert Russell of Solar Cross have been helping prisoners with this often confusing process. Mr. Russell will be visiting the women’s prison in Chowchilla CA again tomorrow and will go over this process with them again, along with doing the education, celebration, and worship activities that bring him there.

Patrick writes:

The CDCR sometimes will strategically “grant” the inmate’s requested religious accommodation on paper, which stops the administrative process, but then never actually follows through with providing the accommodation, which blocks the inmate’s ability to go to court. When the inmate figures out this strategy and files another administrative grievance on the same issue to try to get around the block created by the CDCR, the CDCR’s answer is that the issue has already been addressed. This response by the CDCR under the rules of the official process stops the inmate in his/her tracks, closing the loop.

The explanation continues, of course, and I hope that anyone with an interest in this case, or in cases of religious discrimination, will read the PDF of Rev McCollum’s full statement, by visiting The Wild Hunt.

Tags: ,

5 Responses

  1. Apel Mjausson says:

    It’s great to see that our community is getting serious about addressing religious discrimination in prisons. I will be happy to donate when the legal and campaign strategies have been thought through. This is going to be a lengthy process. Let’s put serious thought into it, intent on not just raising the issue but actually winning.

    To mention just some of the ideas that may be explored:
    * The recent progress against California’s prop 8 was to some extent due to the starring legal minds. Is that a realistic strategy for us?
    * Are there other groups we could approach about partnerships? Secular humanists, the ACLU, minority faiths such as Hinduism, large faith groups such as progressive churches and synagogues?
    * Educating and addressing misinformation about Paganism will no doubt form part of the process. That’s an area in which the anti-prop8 campaign didn’t do so well, but the scholarship shown in the trial was rock solid. Can we learn from that?

    Take your time.

  2. Megan says:

    Actually, if you read the full information from Patrick, he has support from a large number of faiths.

    http://wildhunt.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/PatricksStmtFinal.pdf

    “Those of you interested in knowing more about what the numerous interfaith and faith groups who supported us in this case had to say, should read the Interfaith Community Representatives amicus brief, which is also on that site. Signers of that brief included Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, the America Correctional Chaplains Association, the American Catholic Correctional Chaplains Association, people involved with the Parliament of the World’s Religions and Harvard’s Pluralism Project, among others. We have a lot more friends out there than many of us think, and they all thought this case was both viable and timely.”

  3. [...] T. Thorn Coyle and Solar Cross reiterate their support for Pagan chaplain Patrick McCollum in the wake of his official statement regarding the recent Ninth Circuit Court ruling. [...]

  4. Thorn says:

    Megan. that is correct. The Hindu American Foundation even filed an amicus brief on his behalf.

  5. I have to hope that the end result here is not just changing the “Five Faiths” policy to a “Six Faiths” policy with Wicca added to the list. The current system of granting certain faiths the exclusive privilege of taxpayer-funded chaplains is absolutely unacceptable and needs to be replaced with a system which treats all prisoners equally.